2020.09.15 Planning Commission - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

From:Danny Swensen To:Benjamin Gozola Subject:Request from Lauris Valtinson Date:Tuesday, August 18, 2020 11:11:21 AM Good morning Ben, I wanted to let you know that the two variances requested by Lauris Valtinson should be rejected. There are important reasons why the city has policies and codes related to the height and square footage of signs including protecting citizens, renters, and homeowners from a company like Lauris Valtinson who, as suggested by the evidence, is putting their wants above the common good of the families in the affected neighborhood and the citizens of New Brighton. The New Brighton Planning Commission should follow its own codes and regulations and not rubber stamp these two requests for variances because the citizens in the affected neighborhood lack the political power to stand against these unreasonable proposals due to their race, ethnicity, and culture. I believe that the New Brighton Planning Commision would never approve these proposals if this neighborhood was an upper-middle class, white neighborhood. Consider the following: 1. The proposal is to place this sign in a predominantly residential neighborhood. This will be an eyesore to the apartment buildings and single-family homes nearby. In addition, if it is similar to the current sign (i.e., lighted) it will be a source of light pollution and will affect the quality of life of the families and individuals nearby. 2. The concerns raised in Part 1 could reduce the property values of the houses in the surrounding area as it would negatively affect the "curb appeal." 3. If these variances are approved, there is a possibility that it would discriminate based on the socioeconomic status of the individuals living in this area. This type of sign would never be placed in the wealthier neighborhoods on the west and northwest side of New Brighton. 4. The needs and concerns of the residents should be placed above the needs and concerns of Lauris Valtinson as this is a predominantly residential neighborhood. 5. If these variances are approved, there is a possibility that it would discriminate based on race and ethnicity outlined in Federal and Minnesota anti-discrimination laws and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This action may potentially cause harm to the diverse populations (e.g., based on race, culture, and ethnicity) living in the apartment buildings close by. In conclusion, there are important reasons why the city has policies and codes related to the height and square footage of signs. It is important to stick by those codes and regulations in this situation. Danny Swensen Katie Lane (part of the affected area) 3331 Katie Lane