Laserfiche WebLink
December 10, 2019 Page 4 of 9 <br />The Public Hearing was opened at 7:21 p.m. <br /> <br />Don Gerlach, 73 20th Avenue NW, stated he has lived in New Brighton for over 23 years. He explained he <br />did not support the proposed tax levy because it far exceeded the rate of inflation or the rate of how much <br />income was increasing. He stated the City has increased the levy by 44% in the last four years. He <br />commented he could not understand how a 10% increase was acceptable. He believed the proposed increase <br />was too far ahead of the pace of residents’ income. He encouraged the Council to be responsible with the <br />levy growth rate and have it closer to 5%. He understood the City had great parks, staff and public facilities <br />but he stated he would like the Council to be more considerate of the public when it comes to taxes. <br />Jeffrey Nelson, 690 8th Avenue NW, stated his house value went up 33% which meant his portion of New <br />Brighton taxes would go up 33%. He reported his overall tax bill would be going up by 25.6%. He indicated <br />this was outrageous. He indicated he has never received a 25% increase in his pay in one year and questioned <br />how elderly residents were supposed to cover this large expense. He feared that residents his age would be <br />forced out of the neighborhoods if the City continued to have tax increases that were approaching 10%. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnson asked for additional comments, there were none. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Dunsworth, seconded by Councilmember Jacobsen to close <br />the Truth In Taxation Hearing. <br /> <br />5 Ayes, 0 Nays - Motion Carried <br /> <br />The Public Hearing was closed at 7:27 p.m. <br /> <br />Council Business <br />1. Consider Resolution Adopting the Final 2020 Tax Levy. <br /> <br />Acting City Manager Massopust indicated Finance Director Davitt would be presenting this item to the <br />Council. <br />Finance Director Davitt stated the 2020 General Fund Budget receives 56% of its total revenues from <br />property taxes. The City Council approved a preliminary 2020 tax levy of $10,384,400 on September 10. <br />This represents an additional investment of $871,290 from the levy payable in 2019. The preliminary 2020 <br />tax levy was certified to Ramsey County and used in their calculations for their parcel specific notices mailed <br />to each property owner. <br />Councilmember Burg encouraged the residents with double digit property value increases to contact Ramsey <br />County. She requested further information from staff about the programs that were available to provide <br />assistance with property taxes. Finance Director Davitt explained Ramsey County had a senior deferral <br />program. She encouraged residents to visit Ramsey County’s webpage to learn more about this program. <br />Councilmember Allen commented on how the value of homes in New Brighton was on the rise homes <br />especially for homes valued at $300,000 or higher. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen reported his house value went up 22% and his taxes would be going up by 18%. <br />He indicated this was a great community to live in given the school district and services that were provided by <br />New Brighton. He explained he viewed this as a double-edged sword because if he were to sell his home, the <br />value would be higher, even though it meant his taxes would also be higher. <br />Councilmember Burg stated the Council was apprehensive about the amount of money that was being set <br />aside for debt free streets, but explained Council believed the long-term value to the City was worth the <br />investment today. She described how staff worked to combine purchases and was innovative with requests in <br />order to save the City money long-term. <br />Councilmember Dunsworth explained her home was valued more than the median value home and she <br />would be paying more in taxes. She reported she has looked through the budget through this lens. She <br />commented one of the reasons the City had to have the proposed tax levy was because too many items were <br />deferred during the lean years or recession. She understood the proposal was a lot, but noted the <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Council Business <br />1. Consider <br />Resolution Adopting <br />the Final 2020 Tax <br />Levy. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />