Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF Memorandum <br />Ordinance 875: Large Vehicle Parking Restrictions <br /> <br /> <br />To: City Council <br />From: Ben Gozola, Assistant Director DCAD <br />Meeting Date: 5-26-20 <br /> <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Rights-of-way are intended for many purposes including but not limited to transportation needs (i.e. roads, sidewalks, <br />& trails), utilities, snow storage, boulevard plantings, etc. Not included amongst this comprehensive list of uses is <br />overflow parking for large vehicle operators which should be confined to adjacent private property. A frequent <br />complaint received by the City (which is shared by public safety and public works staff) is that many businesses <br />utilizing large vehicles have become accustomed to expanding their operations into adjacent ROWs such that on- <br />street parking is often dominated by semis, semi-trailers, or related large vehicles. This use of the public right-of- <br />way for overflow parking creates several concerns: <br /> Access issues for surrounding businesses. One area has received multiple complaints from a business <br />whose workers must navigate tight driving lanes and difficult sightline conditions due to semis & semi- <br />trailers from an adjacent business lining the street. <br /> Narrows driving lanes unnecessarily. Roads are often designed to allow for both travel and parking lanes, <br />but may not have been designed for the impact of significant on-street parking of large vehicles which can <br />narrow driving lanes and make turning movements for emergency vehicles more difficult. <br /> Eliminates on-street parking for standard vehicles (i.e. customers & workers). <br /> Allows companies to conduct an amount of business in excess of their site size. <br /> Creates a random/unsightly look in these corridors depending on the condition of the vehicles parked in <br />the ROW. <br />Currently, the only restrictions against this type of parking are a prohibition against on-street parking during the <br />hours of 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., and the six-hour limitation for continuous parking during all other hours. Neither of <br />these regulations is routinely enforced as the status of stationary vehicles in the City is rarely a top priority for the <br />City’s limited public safety resources. Accordingly, staff identified two potential solutions to this long-standing <br />problem: 1) sign the corridors with the greatest number of problems “no parking,” OR 2) Prohibit on-street parking <br />specifically of large vehicles. After internal discussion on the available options, staff believes the best course of <br />action is #2 as it will preserve on-street parking for the types of vehicles the streets were designed for, and ensures <br />no employee or resident parking issues will be created as a result of the new ordinance.