Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />January 23, 2001 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Three public meetings have been held with owners and managers, and their input and <br />feedback have been incorporated into the document. The ordinance would strengthen <br />the reinspection procedures, and a fee would be levied after the second inspection to <br />ensure and correct problems. <br /> <br />In addition, another fee would be enacted in 2002 which relates to the level of public <br />safety calls made to a specific building. In the case of an address generating over .5 per <br />dwelling unit public safety calls, there would be certain expectations placed upon this <br />property and may involve development of a mitigation plan to address issues. The <br />provisional license would allow a 6 month period to keep abreast of identified concerns. <br />Ifthere are repetitive problems/issues with a particular unit or individual, suspension or <br />revocation of a license may occur. Staff will work closely with apartment managers to <br />work through problems before such action is taken. <br /> <br />Glen, Lake Jones Apartment Manager, acknowledged there have been problems, but are <br />attempting to resolve those issues. There have been problems with evicted tenants not <br />removing themselves which involve public safety calls. They are doing their best, <br />however, there are legal obligations and procedures involved in removing a tenant. <br />Moore-Sykes acknowledged Glen's good faith attempt to assist the City and knows the <br />eviction process can be difficult. Larson noted the need for pre-screening of tenants and <br />communication amongst other multi-housing communities. Glen added they have begun <br />a more stringent screening process of applicants <br /> <br />LeFevere explained that a provisional license is required when there is a certain number <br />of police calls to a specific unit. If the increased calls can be attributed to a certain <br />tenant, then a mitigation plan could be developed upon eviction of the tenant. <br /> <br />Terry Troy, Polynesian Village managing partner, noted their commitment to being good <br />citizens, but feels the ordinance is designed for their failure. They have begun working <br />with staff to reduce the number of public safety calls, and requested a 60 day period to <br />allow development of a mitigation plan. If found in violation, their company would be <br />penalized $6,000 annually. They are committed to a safer community, and perform <br />police background investigations on prospective tenants. <br /> <br />LeF evere explained that a license would not be revoked if a facility had an excessive <br />number of calls, however, development of a mitigation plan would be requested. If no <br />improvement has been made after six months, then the plan will be modified. Troy has <br />concern that the public improvement bonds could be revoked if the City feels the <br />mitigation plan was unsuccessful. LeFevere added that the intent of the amendment is to <br />encourage success and improve public safety. Troy requested 60 days to determine <br />alternative language which would assist in their ability to comply with this amendment. <br /> <br />Moore-Sykes said that because residents expressed to the City a need for a safe <br />environment, this ordinance was developed to create solutions for all parties to work <br />together to resolve problems. <br /> <br />Fulton commended the efforts of staff and Polynesian ownership on recent progress, <br />however, calls are still in excess of 100/month. He reiterated this ordinance is not <br />directed primarily at Polynesian, and commended Polynesian for their community <br />involvement and aggressive eviction program. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Multi-Housing Rental <br />Proposed Amendment <br />Report 01-029 <br />