My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-09-22
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1998
>
1998-09-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2005 3:49:35 PM
Creation date
8/8/2005 1:59:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />September 22, 1998 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Benke asked the status of pending ownership of the easement area. Manning said once <br />the plan is approved, PDQ will pursue negotiations with adjoining property owners. <br />Benke asked if the landscaped area could be expanded to resolve the setback issue <br />assuming PDQ would receive ownership. Manning would not anticipate a problem, but <br />the first hurdle would be property acquisition. Benke questioned if a condition of <br />approval should refer to landscaping once ownership is attained. <br /> <br />Benke questioned the need for a variance if there is anticipation that the property will be <br />acquired by PDQ. LeFevere noted that in order for PDQ to receive building permit <br />approval, the variance is required. Benke acknowledges the need, but questioned <br />whether the variance could be classified as temporary. Benke suggested that approval be <br />granted on the condition that PDQ is successful in acquiring ownership which would <br />then satisfy the setback and eliminate the need for variance. <br /> <br />Manning noted that PDQ wishes to begin demolition of the store on September 24, and <br />plans to reopen by Christmas. <br /> <br />LeFevere verified Benke's request for the approval to be contingent on PDQ complying <br />with the setback requirement upon acquisition of the easement area. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Larson, to WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION APPROVING VN-320; AND APPROVE LP-345 <br />SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br />1. PERIMETER CURBING MUST BE INSTALLED PER THE SITE PLAN. <br />2. ALL OFF-STREET PARKING AND DRIVE AREAS BE PAVED WITH A <br />BITUMINOUS SURF ACE. <br />3. ALL OFF-STREET PARKING STALLS SHALL BE MARKED WITH <br />WHITE OR YELLOW PAINTED LINES NOT LESS THAN FOUR <br />INCHES WIDE. <br />4. THE AUTUMN PURPLE ASH SHALL BE REPLACED WITH EITHER <br />SUMMIT ASH OR GREEN SPIRE LINDEN. ALL OTHER <br />LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE PROPOSED <br />LANDSCAPED PLAN. <br />5. PROVISION OF A BOND OR LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT <br />EQUAL TO 100% OF THE COST TO INSTALL LANDSCAPING, <br />CURBING AND PAVING TO ENSURE THAT THESE ITEMS ARE <br />INSTALLED PER THE APPROVED PLANS. <br />6. PROVISION THAT THE FIVE FOOT SETBACK BE RESOLVED UPON <br />ACQUISITION OF PERMANENT PROPERTY OWNERSHIP BY THE <br />APPLICANT. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Benke explained that in August, Council rejected all bids for the proposed Kari <br />LnJLong Lk. Rd. Relief Storm Sewer Project because a majority of affected residents <br />refused to sign covenant forms to restrict future filling of backyard areas. The filling <br />restriction was necessary to protect the low homes from flooding. Council was not <br />willing to proceed with the project without covenants in place. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />PDQ Site Plan and <br />Variance <br />Report 98-189 <br />Resolution 98-092 <br /> <br />Kari Lane Relief <br />Storm Sewer Project <br />Report 98-190 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.