Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />October 22, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Option 2 would install the stop sign for a one year test period. Speed counts would be <br />taken at mid block locations before and after installation. If the percentage exceeding 30 <br />mph is not reduced with stop signs, then they would be removed. The majority of the <br />traffic, 97% based on data, should not be required to stop arbitrarily if the stop sign does <br />not show a reduction in the percent of vehicles exceeding the speed limit. Other studies <br />indicate vehicle speeds increase midblock after stop signs are installed. It would be <br />interesting to see if this holds true in New Brighton. Since Option 2 is a test, it would <br />not establish a precedent of installing unwarranted stop signs. This option does allow <br />time to address the issue of a City-wide neighborhood traffic study. <br /> <br />Option 3 would install the stop signs as requested by the residents. A traffic study <br />cannot support the stop signs, therefore, staff cannot recommend this option. <br /> <br />Benke asked if the study measured both travel directions, and distinguished between <br />eastbound and westbound traffic. Proper said they measured both directions, but it did <br />not distinguish between eastbound and westbound traffic. Proper is unsure whether the <br />Police study measured both travel directions. <br /> <br />Samuelson asked if there will be a pedestrian crosswalk. Proper said the proposal <br />involves only stop signs. Larson questioned whether a crosswalk is a correct usage <br />being there are no sidewalks. Benke said an alternative to a crosswalk would be to paint <br />the shoulders in the 3rd St. approach. Proper said 3rd St. is a 32 ft. wide residential <br />street, and questioned whether striping would be a correct use. <br /> <br />Gene Fisher, 1400--3 rd St., stated that the sign request is a safety issue addressing <br />pedestrian traffic and excessive vehicle speeds in residential areas. He feels a crosswalk <br />would not be a correct use. Samuelson asked if landscape pruning may improve <br />visibility. Fisher said many trees have already been trimmed to allow for better vision. <br /> <br />Terry Dehn, 3rd St., feels the signs may reduce that traffic which use the area as a <br />bypass to 1-35. Many do not stop at the Bristol and 3rd St. sign, and a truck that did not <br />stop hit her daughter. Many run the red light on 3rd St., and she questioned if the <br />previous stop sign arrangement may had been safer. <br /> <br />Mike Meanon, 1735 - 3rd St., does not believe the study data stating the signs would not <br />serve a practical purpose. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Williams, to WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION ORDERING THE INST ALLA TION OF STOP <br />SIGNS ON NORTHBOUND 14TH AVE. NW AT 3RD ST. NW AND ON <br />EASTBOUND 3RD ST. NW AT 14TH AVE. NW. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Benke said the appearance of counters may have skewed traffic patterns, and the <br />summer may provide different -counts than in the winter. He is not prepared to support <br />additional stop signs, but recommends monitoring for periodic enforcement. Option 1 <br />should be pursued next spring if renewed problems occur, but does not favor installation <br />of stop signs contrary to normal warrants and staff opinion. There is merit to <br />experimentation, but it needs to be performed with prior understanding of expectations. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />3rd St. and 14th Ave. <br />Stop Sign Request <br />Report 96-236 <br />Resolution 96-091 <br />