Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />May 9, 1995 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Consent A~enda <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Samuelson, to APPROVE THE CONSENT <br />AGENDA ITEMS AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />CONSOLIDATED VOUCHERS: 063549-063743 FOR A GRAND <br />TOTAL OF $872,203.77. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF <br />THE SBA GRANT OF $3,750. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A REVOLVING <br />PROJECT FOR THE SEALCOATING PROGRAM AND <br />AUTHORIZING A TRANSFER. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AMENDING THE TRANSFERS FOR <br />THE 1994 ANNUAL BUDGET. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT THE RESOLUTION COMMITTING TO A SHARE OF THE <br />FUNDING OF A WATER QUALITY DIAGNOSTIC STUDY FOR <br />SILVER LAKE. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE LIGHTING RETROFIT <br />PROJECT FOR THE CITY GARAGE AND APPROVE THE <br />QUOTATION FROM ADVANCED ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN THE <br />AMOUNT OF $20,462.16 FOR THE WORK. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Public Hearing - 7:42-7:55 p.m. - Minor Subdivision PL-217 - Knoll <br /> <br />City Planner Erny Mattila presented a request to split an existing single family parcel <br />(1760 Silver Lake Road) into two lots. The property would exceed minimum lot <br />standards and have minimal impact on surrounding properties. An existing home <br />occupies the east portion (Lot B), and 75 ft. is proposed to be split off to create the <br />new lot (Lot A). <br /> <br />Larson noted Lot A's western portion contains a structure of railroad ties and <br />concrete belonging to the adjacent property (Lot C) which encroaches onto Lot A. <br />Mattila considers the driveway area an existing encroachment and not a structure; and <br />the City or title company would not become involved because it is a private matter. <br /> <br />Williams feels the encroachment invites a confrontation for whoever purchases Lot A. <br />Mattila said from a legal standpoint this is not a structure; and staff cannot <br />recommend denial based on the encroachment. Williams does not suggest the lot split <br />not occur, but questioned what the City can do to correct this situation. Mattila <br />confirmed that the railroad ties are not raised, but border the driveway. <br /> <br />Consent Agenda <br /> <br />Vouchers <br />Report 95-066 <br /> <br />SBA Grant <br />Report 95-067 <br />Resolution 95~032 <br /> <br />Sealcoating Program <br />Report 95-068 <br />Resolution 95-033 <br /> <br />1994 Budget Transfers <br />Report 95-069 <br />Resolution 95-034 <br /> <br />Silver Lake Study <br />Report 95-070 <br />Resolution 95-035 <br /> <br />Garage Lighting <br />Project <br />Report 95-071 <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Lot Split - PI-217 <br />Knoll <br />Report 95-072 <br />