1994-01-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I Council Meeting Minutes January 25, 1994 Page 7 Council Business. continued Samuelson asked what are the prevailing reasons for an asphalt trail versus a natural path. Anderson said an asphalt trail allows for increased accessibility; excellent surfacing for bikes, wheelchairs and pedestrians; lower cost investment; and limited maintenance. Samuelson commented that crushed rock could be installed initially and the installation of asphalt material could be at a later time. Gloria Fluegel, 3010 - 12th St., asked if the tennis court has been approved and feels it would be a wonderful addition to the park. Benke said the proposal includes the court but its construction would be at a later date. David Ryden, Black Oak Drive, noted the berm along the northeast side and suggested it be angled to allow for better visibility. Anderson noted that the berm's location allows for a natural cut. Benke emphasized that Council has listened to the residents.' concerns. In fact, the City chose to develop and design the park with resident input. Gunderman, a long time Park Board member, noted that whenever a new park is developed near residential areas there is always some anxiety. The fact is that homes adjacent to parks do see increased property values. His first priority is to install equipment which would bring people into the park. His preference is the initial installation of the tennis court and rock material around the pond, and later, asphalt trails. Grass trails could be installed until the traffic patterns are determined. Anderson said the same planting scheme could be installed without the asphalt trail installation. Gunderman feels the budget should reflect higher priority items such as playground equipment and the tennis court. Williams noted that the Park Board spent much time on the trail issue, including the westend access point. They concluded that a hard surface material for the trails is most desirable, and he acknowledged that there are several options to the trail issue. The Park Board seemed comfortable with the 6 ft. wide trail on the northside, subject to liability concerns. However, the Park Board may agree with the staff and the City Attorney recommendations. The Park Board feels that landscaping is first priority. Benke agrees that landscaping should be first priority. The north/south trail is needed, but that piece to the west is of lower priority. He feels that the area's attractiveness will continue to draw people to the park and an unpaved trail system will not discourage that attention. One resident feels the trails should be delayed until traffic patterns are determined. Benke said the major developments in the first year will be landscaping. Anderson's reasoning for the initial asphalt trail installation is that it would allow for park usage and would prevent sod damage. He supports the trail's installation, but respects the Council's decision. Gunderman feels that as many features as possible should be installed within the first years. Anderson noted that because people like to go to a park and walk, he does not see the delay of any of the features being of significant concern. However, he would be willing to accelerate the park's development. Council Business Innsbruck Park Development Plan Report 94-022