My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-10-27
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1992
>
1992-10-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2005 4:08:08 PM
Creation date
8/9/2005 2:30:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />October 27,1992 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />The City received from the Internal Revenue Service a technical advise Bond Sale <br />memorandum, The effect of the memorandum is to call into question the <br />tax exempt status of the tax increment bonds which include the <br />development agreements, The City has not done anything unusual, it was <br />a development agreement supported by an assessment agreement which is <br />a very standard type of agreement. <br /> <br />LeFevere's office does not feel it can issue a tax exempt opinion on these <br />bonds, given the current status. According to the services memorandum, <br />the aspects of the development agreement which renders the bonds taxable <br />is that they are supported by the development agreement and assessment <br />agreement, So LeFevere's office has concluded that the City can issue the <br />tax exempt opinion if it releases all or a portion of the underlying <br />development agreements. <br /> <br />The primary objectives of the development agreements have been <br />accomplished. However, there are assessment agreements in place which <br />require the property be taxed and assessed at a certain minimum level <br />determined by the County, In some cases, there is no continuing need for <br />an assessment hearing, because the assessed valuation of the properties <br />exceeds the minimal value established in the assessment. However, in <br />other cases there may be properties which the assessed valuation is <br />artificially supported by the assessment agreement. If the assessment <br />valuation is lowered, the tax increment generated from the property will be <br />reduced, It could be reduced below the current level, but it may not be <br />reduced below the level that was anticipated at the time the bonds were <br />originally issued. <br /> <br />LeFevere is in the process of assessing any potential problems. Possibly, <br />the potential loss in tax increment could be much less than the savings the <br />City would realize in refunding those bonds, Staff is presently gathering <br />information from the City's Bond Counsel. <br /> <br />LeFevere said because the bonds will be delivered shortly, Council will need <br />to approve the release of those development agreements deemed necessary <br />by the Bond Counsel in order to preserve a tax exempt status. He <br />suggested a special Council Meeting be scheduled on Wednesday. <br /> <br />Childs said the best case scenario is to refund the bonds and remove the <br />assessment agreements, but a worse case scenario is it would be more <br />costly to remove the assessments than to not refund the bonds. The one <br />encouraging thing is that the City can maintain 25 % of those agreements <br />and release about 75%. <br /> <br />Benke said it might be advantageous to continue the discussion to <br />Wednesday, October 28, at 6:30 p.m. to review the updated information, <br /> <br />Announcements and Uodates <br /> <br />Announcements & <br />Uodates <br /> <br />The Association of Minnesota Municipalities Policy Adoption meeting will be <br />November 5. LMC Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.