Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />October 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Council Business. continuec;l <br /> <br />City Planner Erny Mattila presented for consideration boulevard parking on <br />1 st Avenue NW between 6th St. and 7th St. NW, <br /> <br />In 1978, Council took action to allow the vehicle parking on this boulevard, <br />Since that time, Bethel College removed furniture from the Fountain Terrace <br />Apartment Garage and now the garages are used for student parking; the <br />parking lot was expanded to allow for 20 additional spaces; the only vehicle <br />parking on the boulevard on a regular basis is the subject's recreational <br />vehicle; and the subject alley has been paved and serves the southern two- <br />thirds of the block. <br /> <br />Mattila said the City was contacted regarding a recreational vehicle parked <br />on the boulevard, Staff reviewed the situation and Council forwarded the <br />issue for review by the Citizen Study Commission (CSC).'" Staff and the <br />CSC recommends to Council that action be taken to prohibit the parking of <br />vehicles, effective 30 days following Council action, <br /> <br />David Van Hatten, 642--1st Ave., is the recreational vehicle's owner. He <br />thanked the CSC for their time, but feels the circumstances which they <br />investigated the issue was less than complete, For instance, his vehicle is <br />not the only vehicle using the boulevard, however, it is the primary one. <br />The paved alley does not benefit his property because a fence, building and <br />hedge would need to be moved in order to build a parking area. He spoke <br />to his neighbors and found none which object to the vehicle parking. <br /> <br />Mattila noted that the 1978 Council motion was passed to allow boulevard <br />parking to correct problems caused by student street parking. Three years <br />ago, the City required the garages cleaned to allow parking and presently <br />there is no on-street parking problems. To his knowledge, there is no other <br />situation in the City which boulevard parking is allowed. <br /> <br />Mr, Van Hatten feels safety is the biggest factor. In the past, the vehicle <br />was parked in his steep one-car driveway and rolled, crossed the street and <br />damaged several trees. All of this occurred when his daughter was inside <br />the vehicle, His driveway is so steep that it is dangerous to park a vehicle. <br />He and his neighbors have used the area for 35 years to park vehicles and <br />never received complaints. Williams asked if the vehicle could be blocked <br />to prevent it from rolling down the driveway. Mr, Van Hatten said he <br />would need to park the vehicle on the grass alongside the driveway. <br />Williams asked if parking the vehicle in the backyard is impossible. Mr. Van <br />Hatten said it is not impossible, but would be very expensive. <br /> <br />Mattila noted that the City requires recreational vehicles be parked on a <br />paved or concrete surface on a driveway or alongside a garage at least 5 <br />feet from a property line, To his knowledge, this is the only exception, <br />anywhere else in the City a vehicle would be tagged if they parked on the <br />boulevard. <br /> <br />Larson noted that he recently was given 30 days by the City to find a place <br />to store his business vehicle. He did not have a choice and did rent a <br />facility. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Boulevard Parking <br />1 st A venue NW <br />Report 92-232 <br />