Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />March 24, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />In regards to environmental matters, the most effective strategy is to retain <br />the most capable and experienced legal counsel. Childs feels that Mr. <br />Drawz is the very best environmental attorney he has ever worked with. <br /> <br />However. a theoretical downside to a singular attorney relationship is that <br />costs may not be as controllable as in a competitive arrangement. Childs <br />feels it is important to periodically check with other law firms to verify <br />reasonableness of rate structure. Calls were made to several firms who <br />have substantial capabilities in environmental law. The survey showed that <br />Fredrikson and Byron's rates were very comparable to other law firms. <br /> <br />One further issue is the rate split between general environmental matters <br />and the higher rate charged for services reimbursed by the Department of <br />Defense. While these rates are higher than the general environmental fees, <br />they are still lower than the regular rate which Fredrikson and Bryon charge <br />to corporate clients of Mr. Drawz. The $180 rate was established by the <br />court as the rate for legal services on the TCAAP matter, <br /> <br />Rebelein is satisfied with Fredrikson and Bryon's rates and reputation in <br />environmental matters, however, she objects to the higher rate for services <br />reimbursed by the Department of Defense, She feels that whether the fees <br />are paid by local or federal budget, it still comes out of taxpayers pockets. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Williams. to RETAIN JOHN DRAWZ OF <br />FREDRIKSON AND BYRON AT THE PROPOSED RATES TO HANDLE <br />ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL SERVICES; AND THAT SUCH ACTION BE WITH <br />THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />PERIODICALLY PERFORM A COST/RATE SURVEY. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried, <br /> <br />Egan presented for consideration an amendment to the voting precincts. <br /> <br />To bring the City into compliance with the State's redistricting plan, the <br />City will have a small portion of the community in District 52A. In the past. <br />the entire City was located in a single legislative district, District 52B. <br /> <br />To adhere to State requirements that a precinct contain no more than one <br />legislative district. the City will amend the western boundary for Precincts 4 <br />and 6 and create a separate precinct for District 52A. <br /> <br />The new Precinct 7 residents will vote at Pike Lake School along with the <br />residents remaining in the amended Precinct 4. <br /> <br />Advantages for a single polling site include minimal reassignment of <br />residents and little cost increase for election judges. The changes will take <br />effect for the September primary, State requires precinct locations be in <br />place by March 30. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Environmental Legal <br />Services <br />Report 92-071 <br />Resolution 92-028 <br /> <br />Amendment to <br />Voting Precincts <br />Report 92~068 <br />Resolution 92~027 <br />