LP-048 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of 5/17/77 ~ ;~.,._-...:- ..,~- .-"," LP-48, Keith Harstad: The City Planner reviewed his comments noting that this site was in conflict with the proposed Comprehensive Plan and would be subject to the pending interim development control ordinance. The city Planner further noted that two parking spaces adjacent ,to Mississippi Street would have to be removed to meet the 25 foot buffering strip requirement and also that the proposed hedging shown on the south side of the property would have to be changed as the proposed hedging is not an evergreen. .' Mr. Keith Harstad, applicant and developer, was present to answer questions. Commissioner Brown asked Mr. Harstad what construction and how he proposed to build specific plans. the time table was for at this time with no . Mr. Harstad stated that while at this point in time they are undecided on the exact design of the building, they would build either design depending on the Planning Commission and Council preference. Mr. Harstad also stated that if two parking spaces had to be eliminated, the canopy shown on the one design would have to be eliminated which would preclude this design building being built. Mr. Harstad noted that their time table,was that construction would take 90 days from the time of permit issuance. Mr. Duwayne Sorenson, 2177 violet Lane, stated that he liked the design of the building with the canopy. ,Mr. Sorenson also stated that he would prefer either stucco or cedar board siding but would not like concrete block. Mr. Sorenson stated that he was very concerned for a driveway on Violet Lane as this was now a residential street. He further stated that he would not like to see the property rezoned as they would not like to see apartments on the property. He noted that if possible, he would like to see a sprinkling system installed in the landscaped area so'that it could be properly maintained. Mr. Paul Nebel, 2163 Violet Lane, stated that he had lived in the area for nine years and they have waited for all nine years for a nice office building on this site. Mr. Nebel stated that he wasn't sure a developer would build duplexes on this expensive property. He stated he was in favor of this 0ff~ce building but that he was also concerned with a third driveway on violet Lane. He noted that Violet Lane is a residential street and he would like to see it remain a quiet, residential street.