LP-106 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NEW BRIGHTON PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD OF PLANNING . REGULAR MEETING MAY 1, 1980 " .. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY: WIllMUS Staff reviewed the staff report. Mr. & Mrs. Tom Willmus, appiicants~ were present to answer any . questions. Mr~ Willmus stated ~hat he felt the proposal for office/ warehouse would be a compatible development with surrounding uses. He indicated that he would not be in favor of rezoning the property nor having a public hearing on the development. Chairman le~erkuhn indicated that the Comprehensive Pla~ designates the property as a sensitive industrial land use. Rezoning of that property cannot be discarded as an issue. He stated that the Board was discussing the consistency of this proposal with the Comprehensive Plan and not concerned at this time over detailed development plans. The proposal ~re~ented b~ th~ applicant is getting close to what the Plann1ng Comm1ss10n had 1n m1nd for the sensitive industrial land ' uses. I Commissioner.Knu~~"wasconcerned through what process the controls ,: listed, in the Comprehensive Plan could be' applied'to the property.~ He felt .that possibly through a PUD the conditions could be appli.ed .to the property. He noted that from a design standpoint there could possibly"be, changes in the site plan,which could make the d "e vel 0 p me n t m 0 r e ' com pat i b 1 e wit h sur r 0 u r:l din g use s . Commissioner Elmquist stated that the PUDordinance might not be applicable to'this development. Commissioner Baker stated that the Board before making a recommenda- tion on consistency had to know through. what process the standards" would be imposed on the development. Motion by leverkuhn; second by Knuth to recommend the finding that the proposed use o{ the property:is'consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that any consideration of'a building permit ,be contingent on the applicant"~onforming with the standard~ outli~ed on page 8 of the land Use Secti6n of the Comprehensive Plan, and be under"a PUD with conditions consistent wit.h- the standards tn-t~e Compreh~.r"!.~~ve Plan. 6 Ayes - 0 Nayes. motion carried_ Motion by Knuth. second by Elmquist to table the motion and request that staff work out a "procedure for applying the standards with the applicant and report to the Board at its next regular meeting. 6 Ayes - 0 Nayes~ motion carried.