Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~-~. <br /> <br />__"fie <br /> <br />~_-..--~______...-:...o.-..__'---""-'_r . ~ <br />, ~-:'. <br /> <br />II <br />!i <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />I'll RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP-154 <br />(GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF 5TH aVENUE AND NORTH OF 2ND STREET NW). . <br />I <br />II WHEREAS, an application for a variance has been made by Brighton Park <br />Partnership; and <br /> <br />II WHEREAS, the procedural history of the applica'tion is as follows: <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />I 2. The Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, <br />: held a public hearing on September 20, 1988, and all persons <br />II present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. <br /> <br />II NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission makes the <br />! following Findings of Fact in respect to SP-154: <br /> <br />I!I 1. Section 6-370 (c) of the New Brighton Zoning Ordinance allows for a <br />I maximum of 2 dt'iveways to a single property, unless the City' <br />II Council approves a special use permit to allow more than 2 drives. <br />i <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />II <br />I' <br />./ <br />Ii <br />II <br />,! <br />I <br />II <br />I' <br />ii <br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />! <br /> <br />RESOLUTION. NO. 88-16 <br /> <br />N~WB~IGHTONPLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />An application for a variance was filed with the City of New <br />Brighton on September 2, 1988. <br /> <br />" <br />(- . <br /> <br />The subject parcel would contain 3 drives, 2 of which would be used <br />jointly between the subject parcel and the adjacent parcel to the <br />north. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The subject parcel and the parcel to the north would create a total <br />of 3 drives; one less than allowed by Code. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />The establishment, maintenance or operations of the proposed drives <br />would not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, <br />morals, comfort of general welfare. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />The proposed drives would not be injurious to the use and enjoyment <br />of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes <br />already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property <br />values within the neighborhood. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />The establishment of the proposed drives would not impede the <br />nOj'ma 1 C\nd orderly development and inlprovement of the surroundi ng <br />property' for uses permltted in the djstrict. <br /> <br />i <br />II <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />ii <br />Ii BE IT fURTHER RESOLVED, the application for SP-154 is hereby <br />Ii recommended for approval. <br />iI <br />!I <br />:I <br />;f <br />" <br />II <br />11 <br />;J <br />I: <br />II <br />Ii <br />'i <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br />I. <br />I <br />Ii <br />i! <br />/1 <br />II <br />'I <br />!l <br />I! <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />The proposed drives shall in all other respects conform to the <br />applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. <br /> <br />AdoRted this 20th day of September, 1988. <br /> <br />Larry Baker, Chairman <br /> <br />Erny Mattila, City Planner <br /> <br />EM/vi <br />