My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-01-10
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1989
>
1989-01-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 6:28:12 AM
Creation date
8/10/2005 1:39:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Mee ing Minutes <br />January 10, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 21 <br /> <br />Council Bus.ness continued <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Beutel fee s all municipalities should be encouraged to give Ramsey County Charter <br />feedback 0 Chapter Si x regard; ng County Pl ann i ng and proposed Di scuss i on <br />language. Report 89-16 <br /> <br />Brandt did not have comments on Chapter Eight. Initiative. <br />Referendum, and Recall, Chapter Nine. Taxation. and Chapter Ten. <br />Budget; bu asked the Council for their comments. <br /> <br />Benke felt further investigation is needed into Chapter Eight, <br />Initiative, Referendum. and Recall. noting that it appears that a <br />sma 11 majo i ty of regi stered voters can di ctate the need for a <br />Referendum, Recall or Initiative; and could for that matter, tie up <br />county gov rnment for long periods of time. <br /> <br />Brandt fel it may be difficult to make changes with a four-year <br />term. The advantage of staggered terms is that the defeat of an <br />incumbent ight give messages to the commissioners who continue to <br />serve. <br /> <br />LeFevere s ggested 1 eavi ng recall in the document, but removi ng <br />initiative. <br /> <br />Beute 1 sa i <br />constituti <br /> <br /> <br />may be a 1 ega 1 question as to whether recalls <br /> <br />Benke aske if there has been any discussion about changing some <br />elective 0 fices to appointive ones. <br /> <br />Buetel sai the commission has been reviewing the draft with many <br />municipali ies. The commission does not want to make any radical <br />changes wh ch would jeopardize the adoption of the Charter. <br /> <br />The Charte Commission has scheduled a retreat in February to review <br />the docume t and make revisions. The commission wants input from <br />local gove nments. residents. and businesses. <br /> <br />Brandt wil present the Council IS comments to the Commission. <br /> <br />The Commis ion will issue a proposed draft after all comments have <br />been recei ed. <br /> <br />Williams c utions the Commission to not hamstring the ability of <br />local offi ials to made decisions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.