Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meetin Minutes <br />December 13, 1 88 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Council Bus;ne s continued <br /> <br />Motion by Benk , seconded by Williams, to WAIVE THE READING, GIVE <br />THE SECOND REA lNG, ADOPT, AND ORDER THE PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE <br />REPEALING THE XISTING PARKING PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE <br />AND ESTABLISHI G A CHAPTER XI OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE CONTAINING NEW <br />PARKING PROVIS ONS. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nay s, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />The foll owi ng representati ves from the Envi ronmental Protecti on <br />Agency were p esent at the meeting: Art Kleinrath, Project <br />Manager, Joan anoka, Supervisor, Mr. Tim Thielow, Attorney. <br /> <br />Mr. Kleinrath presented the EPA's decision on the replacement of <br />Well #7 (Well 13). Between 1982 and 1984, the City took a number <br />of steps to e sure safe drinking water which included: closing <br />wells #2 throu h #6; deepening of wells #8 and #9 to draw water from <br />a deeper, unc ntam; nated aqu ifer; and i nsta 11 ati on of three new <br />wells (#10, # 1, and #12). At this time, the City has a total <br />supply of 7.6 illion gallons per day (mgd). <br /> <br />Of that 7.6 mg , a little over 1.3 mgd was being delivered from Well <br />#7. Well #7 's the only well that contaminants were found. The <br />levels in Well #7 were well under the drinking water standards, but <br />because of wha EPA thought might be a future problem in contaminant <br />migration and because of the long lead times it takes to do such <br />projects, EPA as still concerned. <br /> <br />In June 1986, EPA signed a Record of Decision, which stated <br />immediate plan ing of providing for water should begin if Well #7 <br />became contami ated beyond consumption. At that time, the EPA did <br />not see any future improvement in the regional ground water <br />contamination; however, the Army had installed a system to block off <br />the migration f contaminants from reCAP which were flowing into New <br />Brighton. In he meantime, the data on the water quality in Well <br />#7 had been st ble and under the drinking water standards. <br /> <br /> <br />In August 198 <br />resulted in a <br />original proje <br />total availabl <br /> <br />, a settl ement between the Army and the US EPA <br />additional 4.6 mgd. This was far more than the <br />tion which proposed the replacement of Well #7. The <br />of 10.9 mgd is far more than the original 7.6 mgd. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Proposed Parking <br />Standards <br />Report 88-348 <br /> <br />Presentation of EPA <br />Covering Replacement <br />of Well #7 <br />Report 88-349 <br />