Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meetin Minutes <br />October 11, '19 8 <br /> <br />Public Hearin <br /> <br /> <br />continued <br /> <br />Benke also fe 1 s uncomfortable about the restri cti on of vehi cl es <br />with a gross eight greater than 4.5 tons (9,000 lbs.) or greater <br />than 30 feet. <br /> <br />Mattila has received complaints of trucks being parked in <br />residential ar as; and according to the present ordinance, there is <br />not a restric ion of the parking of these vehicles, except for <br />overnight pa king. Mattila explained that including these <br />restrictions in the ordinance would provide for additional <br />enforcement in these instances. <br /> <br />Benke question d the word "establishedll in the General Requirements <br />Section under pplication referring to all buildings and land uses <br />established af er the effective date of this ordinance. Mattila <br />explained this section would become effective for any new <br />development up n the adoption of the ordinance; but the off-street <br />parking and 10 ding would be enforced under Existing Uses. Brandt <br />asked, if the word "existingll appl ies to all provisions of the <br />ordinance, an expressed concern about the truck parking in <br />residential ar as. Mattila agreed with Benke and Brandt, and feels <br />further reS8a ch would have to go into the wording of this <br />application. Benke felt the use of the word "established" would <br />need to be replaced. <br /> <br />Benke questioned the types of surfaces allowed in the Construction <br />and Maintenan e Section under Surfacing. Benke felt the wording <br />of this section implies that every surface would be required to be <br />paved. Matti a explained that several homes have decorative block <br />and brick driv ways, and generally the wording of this section would <br />restri ct dust produci ng surfaces. Benke felt thi s secti on woul d <br />need further c arifying. Williams agreed that further clarification <br />would be needed between existing and future developments. <br /> <br />Benke question d an item in the Construction and Maintenance Section <br />under Location which pertained to the location of the one open paved <br />space located on the side of the driveway, away from the principal <br />use. Mattila suggested changing the sentence to read, lithe open <br />paved space ca not be located in front of the pri nci p 1 e usell. Benke <br />felt further discussion is needed into this section. <br /> <br />Benke questio ed the need to distinquish between Business and <br />Industrial Districts in the Setback Area of the Location Section. <br />Mattila was n t sure of why distinction, other than keeping the <br />truck traffic away from the residential areas. <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Pub 1 ic Hear i ng <br /> <br />Amending of Parking <br />Standards Ordinance <br />Report 88-296 <br />