Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_r <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />SP-61 <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />June 24, 1975 <br /> <br />Bohling stated that he has trouble with the lack of <br />landscaping on this side of the property. <br /> <br />Partyka stated that he doesn't believe the variance request <br />meets the ordinance conditions for granting avar;iance. <br /> <br />Mr.' Bettenberg and Mr.. Dahlke stated their opinion that <br />the type of landscaping provided in the area is more important <br />than the width of the lanQscaping strip. <br /> <br />Councilman Rebelein.requested the applicant to document <br />the fact that the 60' green strip would be ai hardship if it. <br />had to be provided. He further asked whether a 50', 40' or 30' <br />~reen strip would also be a hardship as opposed to the 25' <br />requested. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlke stated that the particular figure chosen is the <br />result of a need to be able to park two rows of trailers running <br />east - west on the site with:anadequate maneuve~ing area between <br />them. He stated that this will not allow a 60' landscape <br />strip to be provided. He further stated, however, that he <br />'would be willing to provide the maximum feasible depth to <br />the buffer strip. <br /> <br />- <br />planninq Commission Recommendation 6-l~-75: <br /> <br />Motion by Parham, seconded bY Bohling, to recommend approval <br />of SP-6l subject to the site being adequately screened from <br />the residential area to the north and to proviae an attractive <br />entrance into"the City. <br /> <br />Motion carried, 2-1 (P~rtyka) <br /> <br />Partyka stated that he does not agree with this use in this <br />specific location. <br /> <br />Chairman Parham asked that the record show that the reasons <br />for the majority recommendation were that similar uses are <br />allowed in I-I districts and that this use is compatible with <br />the I-I zoning. <br />