SP-061 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

! SP-6l -2- July 22. 1975 could be greatly hampered by an unattractive or otherwise. detrimental. use at a ~ajor entrance. '.':' The site development plan is discussed in conjunction with the 'variance and building permit requests. Pla~vinqCommission Consideration 6-17-75: The Building and Planning Coordinator summarized his comments regarding the proposed special use permit, variance and landscape and plpt plan. Mr. Bill Jacobson, architect, Alton Dahlke, owner, and James Bettenberg, a~~Qrney, were present to represent the applicant and ans~e~ questions. Mr. . Jacobson explained the plot plan. He noted in response t.o a concern,~,expressed bY<1;he Building and Planning Coordinator that ,the lilac screen would~e two feet high, bare root stock, but that thi~ type of plant grows fast. He further noted that a larger size would 'h&ve exorbitant cost. . ,~r. Bettenberg added his comments and stated that he' believes the ~~tback required by ouF ordinance is measured from the street rather than from the propert~ line. 'The'B'uildin9 and Planning Coordinator and members of the Planning Commission corrected this interpretation. Mr. Bettenberg then stated that perhaps the applicant would have . to modify his variance request. He also stated that the applicant would be willing to consider reasonable alt.ernatives to the screening proposed and expressed a willingness to dedicate a sewer easement for an existing storm sewer on the property that does not have an easement. Lastly, Mr. Bettenberg stated that Mr. Dahlke had contacted.three property owners to the north and that they had ~oiced no objection to the proposal. Bohling asked' why the driveway was being located on the west side of the property. Mr. Jacobson explained that this driveway was for the purpose of picking up and dropping of parts and and would be used for this purpose 5 - 6 times per day.