Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'( <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />sl?-~l <br /> <br />-3.... <br /> <br />July 22, 1975 <br /> <br />aOh~in9 stated that he has trouble with the lack of landscaping <br />on t.h:L~ ~iQe of the property. <br /> <br />Partyka stated that he doesn't believe the variance request <br />meets the ordinance conditions for granting a variance._ <br /> <br />.Mr.Bettenberg and. Mr. Dahlke stated their opinion that the <br />type of l4ndscaping provided in the area is.more important than <br />the width of the landscaping strip. <br /> <br />Councilman Rebeleinrequested the applicant todocurnentthefact <br />that the 60' green strip would be a hardship if it had to be <br />provided. He further asked whether a 50', 40' or 30' green strip <br />would also be a hardship as opposed to the 25' requested. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlke stated that the particular figure chosen is ~~- <br />~result'of a need to be able to park two rows of trailers running <br />east-'west on the site with an adequate maneuvering area between <br />them. He stated that.this will not allow a 60' landscape. strip , <br />to be provided. Hr further stated, however, that he would be <br />w:j,;;t.l,..mg to provide the maximum feasible depth to the buffer strip.... <br />:~~~..(:\-' - \i <br /> <br /> <br />,(~~i::r Commission Recommendation 6-17-1.5: <br /> <br />Motion by Parham, seconded by ~ohling, to recommend approval <br />of SP-6l subject to the site being adequately screened from the <br />residential area to the north and to provide an attractive entrance <br />into the City. <br /> <br />~otion carried, 2-1 (Partyka) <br /> <br />Partyka stated that he does not agree with this use in this <br />specific location. <br /> <br />Chairman Parham asked that the record show that the reasons, <br />for the majority recommendation were that similar uses are allowed <br />in ~""l districts and that this, U~e is compatible with the 1-1 zoning. <br />