My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-097
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 001-100
>
VN-097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 5:58:54 PM
Creation date
2/20/2007 11:29:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
+ • 'VN-97 ,Sambas - <br />Feb 13 <br />P. ~ , <br />Would govern a sigrfat the proposed location according `to the standards <br />presented in the report,'"Proposed Revision of the 'Vi1l:age Sign, <br />.Ordinance: A Street Graphics System for the .Village af'New`Brighton." <br />.::Motion Carried 5--0 _ <br />PROP4SED:.SIGN STANDARDSa <br />The Community Betterment Task Force Street Graphics sub--committee has <br />reviewed the subject reque"st in relatie~s to the proposed sign ordinance <br />-.and respectfully submits the .following,. guidelines: <br />1. The allowable maximum height is based on the more liberal <br />allow~ano~s~ provided by the property, abutment on New Highway 8. <br />That height limitation is 22 feet. <br />2', The allowable area using the same gctideZines is 90 square ~eetf <br />3 The maximum items of information shall be 10. Elimination of the <br />"OPEN 24 HOURS," portion of the sign could, for-instances, reduce <br />the items o~ information to below 10 and mould aid in obtaa,ning <br />maximum allowable height of the identification portion of the <br />sign. <br />4. The sign shall not utilize any moving or rotating parts nor shall <br />it utilize flashing lights. <br />In justification of adherence to the guidelines established by the <br />proposed ordinance-the .following is submitted" <br />The physical location of the property does not justify unusual <br />considerations in height and area allowances. The property is <br />over 1600 feet from 35W. The argument-for needed freeway visibility ' <br />should be considered only in those cases wherein the property in <br />- questions is within 600 feet of-any-freeway. J <br />-ADMINISTRATIVE DISCUSSION: <br />The requested sign is 348 square feet in area. This is 48 square feet <br />.more-than what would be allowed under the ordinance. <br />Sambo's has indicated that it-has a-'sign which is 221 square feet in'' <br />.area and:38~ feet in height. This sign .could be constructed without <br />need of a'variance provided that the required 40 ft.. setbacks from New <br />-Trunk Highway,No. 8, County Road D and Long Lake Road are observed:- It ~` <br />-seems that Sambo's intention at this time is to propose the .smaller sign <br />rather than, the.... one .first,.presented, <br />,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.