VN-154 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,ncil Proceedings - 2 qty of New Brighton lay 25, 1976 Public Hearings ;Attorney stated hearing was properly c~:lled The Building and'Pl"arming Coordinator reviewed the planning report and the planning Commission recommendations _ Mr, Jerry Skiba, 2142. 01d Hwy 8, asked whether the proposed ' use was for a junk `yard. He stated t~iere was not enough land.far the proposed use and stated op~ositian tc~ NC-5 NC-5 The City Manager '.advised the Council that he had Blomquist received a call from the applicant's attorney indicating 821 to th'atthe applicant intended to withdraw the r~quesi.: and 82~ that a letter would follow. Motion by-4~7~rdouschegg, seconded by _Senden to continue Continue hearing on NC-S to June 8, at 8.05 to June_S 5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried 8:05 Attorney stated hearing was properly called:.` The City P1.anner reviewed his report end the '~lznning Commission recommendationse - VN-154 No one spoke. regarding the variance. and. no'one was 8e30 0 present representing the aoplcant 8e44 Motion by Senden, seconded by Werdouschegg to close .hearing 5 ayes - 0 Hayes-:carried Motion by t~ierdouschec~g, seconded by Senden to approve VN-154 for a 7 :foot high, -4 x 5-:foot model home sign subjec to the: following.. conditions; I< That the sign be erected and maintained for a period not ' to exceed I6 ~~~onths, 2. That the sign be set°baekfrom Long :Lake load 25 feet or morea Councilman Fisher stated for the records`that while he does not necessarily oppose the placement of the..sign ir~`that location, he felt that there were no circumst=ances unique to the property that would ,cause the particular provi ion of ttze code to w ork undue .hardship,. and ` that the circumstances of the property were mitigating -to the nanconiormity. Under these conditions it would be a : mcr e reasonable approach to revise- the legislation. A special use situa-lion was suggested. 4 ayes -.I Hoye (Fisher)..- carried fittorney stated hearing was properly called. The VN-155 City .Manner reviewed the planning report and the Lakatua planning Commission recommendations. David Lakatua, applicant, was present. to respond ,to 8045 to Council questions. 9:02 In response to a Council question ape Fttarney indicated that he believes this matter. could be handled-by way of easement rather than variance.