VN-165 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r -5- Oct. 19, 1976 Councilman Hardt asked how wide the new lot would be at its widest point. NTro Peterson stated the lot t~aould be 12.5 feet in width at its. maximum :width. Councilman Hardt asked which way the new house would face. i~r. Peterson indicated the house would face the. lake. Councilman Hardt asked if there were any barriers between the ,lots. Mr. Peterson noted that there is a row. of pines-separating his father's property and. the lot to the. easto she City Planner noted. that any homes constructed. in the area would have to have a basement. elevation of at Least 3 feet higher than the regional flood level of Long .Lake. Mr. Peterson indicated-.that a drawing. was being prepared showing `this elevation. where the home could. be: located. Mr. Peterson said his intention is just. to divide this rather unusualparcel -in a manner in which he can also build-a house. Mr. Peterson also indicated that they hs.d,talked to the neighbor. to the east. and that the neighbor had not e~ipressed any .objections: Fredrickson stated that she felt there w~~s a legitimate concern for traffic. `Fredrickson noted that traffic .near this .curve is dangerous . Councilman Hardt asked if. there could. be just one driveway. l~~.r. Peterson indicated that this could be done but that an easement -would be necessary. Partyka said that he sees no problem with the two driveways. Partyka noted that common driveways can create problems in terms of access rights and maintenance. Fredrickson stated that she felt there would be problems in getting financing for the house if there is not a separate driveway. Fredrickson also noted that she was uncomfortable with the odd. shaped parcels.. Partyka stated. that. he saw no problem wzth the shape of the lot. Partyka said that this was a rather unique parcel which is the aftermath of a number of other events and that he felt this way a good way to handle the problem.