Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PRD #27 <br />VN-206 <br />Page #5 <br />Under the Planning Commission recommended.R-109, with both street <br />and the park deleted, the potential density would be: <br />R-1, 68,420 sq. ft. 8,000. = 8 units <br />R-2, 408,390 sq. ft. 5,000 = 81 units <br />TOTAL 89 uni is <br />or. a density of 8.13 units/acre <br />If the property were developed under-the normal standards, without <br />a PRD,. unit density would be: <br />A. Under R-103 and R-107 <br />R-1, 68,420_sq. ft. 10,000 = 6.8 units. <br />R-2, 519,243 sq. ft. 12,500= 83.0 units <br />(2) <br />R-3B', 98,235 sq. ft. 4,375 = 22.4 units <br />TOTAL 112.2 units <br />B. Under R-109 <br />R-t, 68,420 sq, ft. 10,000.= 6.8 units <br />R-2, 617,478 sq. ft. 12,500= 98.9 units <br />(2) <br />TOTAL 05.6 units <br />The last two calculations again delete only the land proposed to be <br />public streets, It seems extremely unlikely to me that park property <br />would be .donated under normal platting with no density increases., <br />Summarizing the various density calculations the important numbers to <br />remember are: <br />WITH PRD (Streets Deleted) <br />R-103 & R-107 139 units <br />R-109 131 units <br />WITH PRD (Streets & Park Deleted) <br />R-103 & R-107 98 units <br />R-109 89 units <br />NO PRD (Streets Deleted) <br />R-103 & R-107 i12 units <br />R-109 105. units <br />APPLICANTS PROPOSED PRD #27 114 _units- <br />