My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-228
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2007 6:34:49 AM
Creation date
3/8/2007 4:28:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXTRACT OF MINUTES <br />`~ NEW BRIGHTON PLANNING COMMISSION <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />DECEMBER 20, 1983 <br />VN-228, KOREAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH <br />Staff recommended denial of the variance request on the <br />grounds the applicant had not shown sufficient evidence <br />of unique circumstances or undue hardship. <br />Mr. Hak Soo Kim submitted a photograph of the church <br />that showed the cross attached to the building earlier <br />this year. Mr. Kim stated that because there are <br />windows all across the front of the building there is no <br />room to put the cross on the building facade. <br />Chairman Williams asked the applicant if he feels it is <br />necessary to pint the cross above the roof line for <br />people to see it. <br />Mr. Kim stated that that is the reasoning. He stated <br />people are usually looking at the skyline for a cross. <br />In addition the cross would help with the confusion that <br />the school is now a church. <br />Chairman Williams asked if the sign adjacent to the <br />front door was up yet. <br />Mr. Kim stated it was not. <br />Chairman Williams asked if the cross could be located <br />where it was shown in the submitted photograph. <br />Mr. Kim replied that in that location the cross could not <br />be attached securley to the building. <br />Chairman Williams asked if the applicant had considered <br />putting the cross and church name together in a sign to <br />be located near the street. <br />Mr. Kim stated it was the desire of the church not to <br />disturb the front yard and that this alternative had been <br />considered unsuitable. <br />Commissioner Dee Weaver stated she had examined most <br />churches in the community and they all seem to have a <br />sign and a cross. <br />Commissioner Livingston stated that the applicant's cross <br />was small in comparison to other churches. <br />Motion by Williams, seconded by Livingston to close the <br />public hearing. <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br />8:00 P.M. - <br />8:10 P.M. ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.