My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 10-07-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 10-07-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:15:32 AM
Creation date
3/14/2007 5:45:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 7, 1981 Park Board Minutes <br />Page- 6 <br />correcting the lake algae problem. The population in snowmobiles, <br />boats, etc. has increased. The group has assisted with enforcing <br />snowmobile regulations, etc. and has acted as clean up crew on <br />the. lake. The group is concerned with the safe use of Long Lake. <br />and maintaining the quality of the lake. <br />It is the associations intent to express their concerns and <br />anxieties with respect to the proposed park. The association <br />is truly in favor of the park.- However, it does not necessarily <br />agree with the proposed extensive development of he park for the <br />reasons noted in the letter. <br />The association has asked pertinent questions to the City, County <br />and Commissions and other people involved in the planning, but <br />these questions have gone .unanswered for various reasons, including <br />people do not want us to know and maybe the groups did not have <br />the answers themselves, <br />Our position statement is one of concern and relates to park develop- <br />ment: <br />A. City Park - this option should be explored. <br />B. Development - The 1976 park survey results. should have been <br />incorporated into the plan. <br />C. Security - there have been an increase of losses, concerned <br />with the problem. <br />D. Lake watercraft proposed laun.ehing area and suggested. canoe <br />rental facility will increase the number of watercraft during <br />the summer. This. problem should be addressed when considering <br />these. facilities. <br />Motion by Dahl, seconded by Carlson, to .accept. the letter. .Motion <br />.passed. <br />Dahl asked Commers if she actually meant the Planning Commission <br />when she referred to them checking into things or if she meant <br />the Park Board. <br />Commers responded whoever was involved in planning the park. <br />Schmidt said he was-also confused by the term Planning Commission. <br />Johnson said each time she referred to the Planning Commission, <br />the Park Boar-d or appropriate advisory board should be inserted. <br />Schmidt said the Planning Commission is not involved in the park <br />planning. <br />Gunderman asked Commers to explain the "people don't want us to <br />know" clause. <br />Commers said the letter represents others besides herself. They <br />are not getting answers. Have asked at board or commission meetings <br />and always been told will get back to you - never did,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.