PRECM 07-01-1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

July 1, 1981 Park Board Minutes Page 10 Gunderman said he wanted to get fair: representation. Anderson went over the concept plan so that. residents would have an idea of what is being planned. Many things cannot be decided at this time, they have to be decided as they occur. There is no development that is close to the lake except the .beach and boat launch. The boat launch is the only detailed portion of the plan that has been approved. There will be six spaces avaiiab e for trailers with approximately 20 other spaces for cars. One resident commented that as the petition shows there is a strong feeling for a nature center.. Will we get input. Gunderman said not at this time. Tonight the discussion is on the.joint'powers agreement. Johnson stated that in the operation and maintenance portion stating the County has the option to contract with New Brighton or other agency, it should be noted that New Brighton has the first option to referral if it is contracted out. Van Hatten asked if a motion was needed. Gunderman responsed whatever is your pleasure. Van Hatten said he would motion for discussion purposes. Motion by Van Hatten, seconded by Dahl, to recommend the proposal for adoption as presented. Amendment by Van Hatten,: seconded by Carlson, to change page 2, number 2 of the joint powers agreement. The changes would be to add the words "and County" after "..provided at other regional" and change the words "implementing agency" to the word "responsible." Amendment passed. Johnson asked why we donut have it relative to all regional parks have them all the same. Carlson stated that the buy-back clause be worded by the City Attorney so that Ramsey County adheres to the agreement. Johnson agreed. Dahl suggested instead of the buy-back clause say ownership not change hands until 1984. Lease the land. Carlson stated he wants the option to say that we own the land if Ramsey County should come up with something City doesn`t want.