My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 08-13-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1980
>
PRECA 08-13-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 12:25:00 PM
Creation date
3/15/2007 1:23:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7) Golf course club house renovation <br />for either public space or private <br />rental (in the event the Park Department <br />returns to City Ball) $10,000-$20,000 <br />The 1.981-1982 capital improvement worksheets recently sub- <br />mitted by the Park Board are also attached to this report. <br />`these worksheets will give you some idea as to the projected <br />uses of park and golf course capital improvement project <br />funds, as requested, during the next six (6) years. <br />Also attached is a report dated July 22, 1980 from the <br />Finance Director which addresses the status of reserve <br />balances projected at year end 1980 and at year end 1981. <br />Given that there exists more projects than funds on hand, <br />the Council must establish their priority objectives in <br />order to arrive atan allocation of the monies. While it <br />is not generally prudent to authorize projects prior to <br />funds being on hand, I believe that we can reasonably <br />assume that the liquor profits for 1981 will be at least <br />$150,000, as projected, and that the $95,000 of revenue <br />sharing will also be received. <br />ray recommendation on the use of the 1980 General Fund <br />surplus is that the City ought not draw that $350,000 down <br />• more than $100,000. 1 make this statement for three reasons: <br />First, a $250,000 General Fund surplus represents only <br />slightly more than 10% of the General Fund budget. Second, <br />I foresee future budgetary problems in funding the operating <br />budget and believe that we must eventually begin to prudently <br />draw down on this surplus in order to meet current operations. <br />Third, since most of the projections that are being used for <br />costs are simply guesstimates, it would appear to me that <br />the General Fund surplus should represent our fall-back <br />position. If, for example,, we project the liquor store to <br />cost $700,000 and',in the final analysis it costs $725,000 <br />we may wish to use the General fund surplus to provide the <br />cushion. <br />As mentioned earlier in the report, I believe that the <br />Council ought to state their objectives in some priority. <br />I present my objectives to you for evaluation. In priority <br />they are: <br />1) That the City must recognize the significance of the <br />municipal liquor operation to long term capital funding <br />of projects within the City. The City must also recognize <br />the deterioration of the present facility and the positive <br />influence the new liquor store would have on the revital- <br />ization of downtown. Accordingly, the new municipal <br />liquor store should receive top priority for funding. <br />-2-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.