My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 07-02-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1980
>
PRECM 07-02-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:53:04 AM
Creation date
3/16/2007 8:00:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 2, 1980 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 6 <br />Motion by Johnson to recommend. to the Council keeping the <br />free skating where it is having a picnic location to the <br />eastern portion and a separate entrance mid-block and exit <br />where the existing one is with. narrower-entrances and.eXits <br />one way.. <br />Motion died for lack of second. <br />Motion by Van Hatten, seconded by Dahl, to recommend the first <br />proposal shown with the parking lot maximized and the parking <br />lot be without the external. drive on the west side. <br />Motion passed. Johnson naye. <br />Dahl said she ds not ready to say we don't-want any kind of <br />walkway. The idea is nice to keep the pedestrians away from <br />the traffic. We do .need to maximize the area but. it seems <br />there may be .some-other possible ways of doing it;for instance <br />cutting the berm off a little earlier (toward the, north). Likes <br />the rest of the motion, Likes the entrance where it is and the <br />free skating and picnic area where they are but not .ready to <br />say the design of the actual parking area should or shouldn't <br />be as shown. <br />Van Hatten added to the motion, and Dahl seconded, that alterna- <br />tives to the parking lot be seen before a final decision by <br />the Park Board is made. <br />Van Hatten would also like to see existing-heavy structures, <br />such as the sign and streets, shown on the map. <br />Carlson commented that if the berm is eliminated, we will be <br />at the same point now .with. people driving through. Could the <br />sidewalk be moved to the west outside edge of the parking lot <br />and then put a crosswalk with stop. signs at the entrance before <br />it comes into the parking lot itself. <br />Anderson said another possibility would be to move the berm <br />grass area into the center. You wouldn't lose many parking <br />spaces that way. <br />Grimshaw asked if this was being done to funnel people to the <br />ball fields. <br />Anderson responded yes. <br />Carlson said the cars are now going up the hill. If that's the <br />case, would it be good to do something to discourage it, Should <br />it be done now. <br />Harcus said shrubs seem to have eliminated the problem consider- <br />ably. <br />Anderson said more shrubs could be planted.. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.