My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 04-02-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1980
>
PRECM 04-02-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:51:33 AM
Creation date
3/16/2007 8:08:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 2, 1980 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 2 <br />and commissions.- The Council has been meeting with board and <br />commission chairpersons quarterly and with boards and commissions <br />at least once a year. The purpose of these meetings is to dis- <br />cuss what each is doing so that there is an understanding be- <br />tween the. Council and each board or commission, also to discuss <br />plans and to be sure things are going in .the right direction. <br />The Council feels it is important to know that-the Comprehensive <br />Park Plan is: now Park. Board priority so that-they may work with <br />the Park Board on this project. <br />Dahl asked how much information the .Council has received regarding <br />the. Park Board's discussion on the Comprehensive Park Plan. <br />Benke stated that .the Council is receiving Park Board minutes and <br />attachments. <br />Gunderman asked if the Council was satisfied with the Park Board <br />minutes. <br />The Council members responded yes. <br />Gunderman asked if .they were too long. <br />The response was no. <br />Schmidt felt it was nice to have the discussion in the minutes. <br />Dahl asked what is happening with Hansen.. Park (particularly the <br />west side). <br />Anderson responded the Council sent the plan back to the staff and <br />Park Board to be reworked. There was discussion regarding incl~.t~sion <br />of the plan in the consultant work done on the comprehensive plan. <br />No work is currently scheduled for Hansen in 1980 'but. the plan <br />must be ,completed-prior to 1981. <br />Dahl asked if there was any. critical timing involved. <br />Anderson said there always is when property is :just sitting <br />because many times things come up that may be useful. <br />Gunderman felt Long Lake site ..should. be looked:at. It'-should be <br />decided what will happen if the County backs out. What will the <br />City do .with or without-the County. He feels it would be a dis- <br />service to the residents if nothing was done. The: City should <br />have an alternative plan. The City can't-wait years for the <br />County to move. He feels Long Lake should be-looked at informaly <br />and feelings should be expressed on what should be done. The park <br />should be cleaned up and available for New Brighton residents. <br />Benke asked if the .County will pay the City for maintaining the <br />park. <br />Anderson stated that the County is consideringa 75-25o County <br />split. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.