My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 03-05-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1980
>
PRECM 03-05-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 1:25:44 PM
Creation date
3/16/2007 8:20:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />March 5, 1980 Park Board Minutes Page 7 <br />• Gunderman also stated he was concerned with what to do with <br />Long Lake. After years of waiting for the property, now we <br />may have to wait longer. Perhaps New Brighton could do some- <br />thing on its own., <br />Anderson informed the Park Board that he had submitted a CETA <br />application for clean up of Long Lake but it had been refused. <br />Anderson also stated that plans and diagrams were being ob- <br />tained to assist the Department in building a track setter for <br />cres_s country skiing. <br />Gunderman asked about protecting the area. <br />Anderson felt a fence should be installed around the total <br />area with cost being approximately $40,000. <br />Anderson stated he would like to open up the site to resi- <br />dents td get.wood off of the property.* He would like to do <br />this in an orderly fashion. <br />Dahl felt the Community Leaders Workshop was a good idea; to <br />let individuals knee what the expectations are for each commi- <br />ttee. <br />Benke noted that each Board or Committee would be responsible <br />• for drafting their own statement of expectations. <br />Gunderman felt this, was a very good idea. <br />The statement.of expectations would be sent along with the <br />application. <br />D. Rice Creek (Park Place) <br />DeBenedet, Engineer representing RCE Corp, the developer, <br />reviewed what had happened at the Council meeting and also <br />with the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated that the <br />Watershed District did not accept plan #3 which the Park <br />Board had wanted. Plan #1 and #4 were accepted by the Water- <br />shed District. The Council directed the developer back to <br />the Park Board with a compromise between the two that were <br />accepted. <br />DeBenedet presented a new plan with a'holding pond in the <br />northeast end of the property and one in the southeast. <br />Van Hatten asked if the water will drain from the entire <br />area into the holding pond in the southeast. <br />'The response was no, only the area around the condominium. <br />. The pond in the northeast would be turned over to the City <br />(City does not have to accept it). Developer would like to <br />deed the pond in the northeast but not the southeast one.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.