My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 03-05-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1980
>
PRECM 03-05-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 1:25:44 PM
Creation date
3/16/2007 8:20:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />March 5, 1960 Park Board Minutes Page 9 <br />A resident asked if this new plan would stop any of the"pre- <br />• viously planned facilities. <br />Anderson stated that if the pond to the south were moved down <br />to the border, everything could be done that had been talked <br />about. <br />A resident asked how steep the grade was around the pond at <br />the southern end ofthe park. <br />The developer responded that a small child could.crawl out. <br />A resident expressed concern as to how the pond would look.. <br />The developer stated that it.would be dry except when it was <br />raining. It would.be.maintained and would be a grassy area. <br />Dick Ernst stated there is a pond there now and the drainage <br />is adequate. With a new-sewer pipe to handle the extra water, <br />it will be adequate. <br />A resident was concerned that the pond at the southern end of <br />the property would be too close to the baseball and play area. <br />Would like to see a 'fence around the pond. <br />The developer stated he prefers not to fence the pond because <br />• if a child did get in he'may not be able to getout. <br />Johnson asked if there were any thoughts to making a perman- <br />ent pond. <br />Anderson stated there would be no advantage to it. <br />Benke stated that since this was a new proposal, it should go <br />back to the Council. <br />Dahl stated the new plan looks.like a good compromise. The <br />developer has done a good job. <br />Motion by Dahl, seconded by Van Hatten; that the Park Board <br />accept the current plan with the pond on the southern end <br />moved down to the border. <br />Van.Hatten made an ammendment to the motion that the northern <br />area be part of the park. Johnson seconded. <br />Main motion as ammended passed. <br />VI. Old Business <br />A. Comprehensive Park Plan <br />• Dahl felt a special meeting for Comprehensive Park Plan <br />should be set. Olson and Grimshaw'agreed. <br />March 26th,.8:15 p.m. at City Hall Council Chambers was set <br />for the Comprehensive Park Plan and Goal Setting meeting.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.