PRECM 02-06-1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

February 6, 1980 Park Board! Minutes Page 8 Cadwallader stated t~,here would be shielding of some sort on the border to separate the.: park fr..om the condominiums but he has not yet d'~ecided what it will be. Gunderman stated the', Planning Commission and the developer should be complimented on a well done .job, He is very pleased with the plan. Council Represeritati e Berke asked the Park Board how important the western part of the land 'is to them: It may be a maintenance problem. Is an access there really needed? Dahl stated she felt..,,a~walking access was necessary there. Van Hatter felt ,the hill was too steep for walking access. Residents disagreed 'and said itys not that bad and the kids ..walk it all the timel. Gunderman asked if there would be drainage problem and .potential conflicts with the Glatershed.District. Cadwallader said there shouldnQt be a problem. TYie City Planner ,stated that the Watershed District is `looking.-at the area now, Right now they are in the pre- liminary stage but foresee no problem. with.. drainage. The City .Planner suggested. that. the Park. Board°s motion nchude a statement that the final grading-`plan be re- ferred back to the Park Board. Planning Commi~s~on 3. 4, o-nr.e:~da°~cns anal Park BoaRc;. ~:esponse • THAT THE. COUNCIL CONSIDER ESTABLISHING-THE .POLICY THAT THE PARK PROPERTY BB DEDICAED.TO THE CITY Ira THE FORM OF DEEDING THE PROPERTY TO THE CITY. .THAT IN~LIEU OF A DEED TRANSFER OF 'THE PROPERTY THAT APPROPRIATE LEGAL AGREEMENTS BE CONCLUDED BE TWEEN THE CITY AND THE APPLICAPdT REGARDING .USE OF THE PARK r FACILITIES AND.PROPERTY. Motion by Van`Hatten seconded, by Dahl, that Item,#t3 be approves. P•Toiion passed. THAT TH PROPOSED.PAPK BE AT ,LEAST S; ACRES IN SIZE Motion.5y Van Hatter.seconded by Hs~gari, to-accept developers 4.9 plus acres as acceptable. Motion passed. Johnson motioned, Olson. seconded, to ammend the motion stating this s an acceptable size park in this situation. :Motion fai? ec .