My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 01-11-1978
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1978
>
PRECM 01-11-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:32:51 AM
Creation date
3/19/2007 11:46:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_g_ <br />Could reply to that? <br />MA The building has been examined very closely by the city's .building inspector <br />a,nd one of-the things we're talking about , we talked about it nearly a year ago <br />was the possibility of .razing the building. Right now. it's extremely hazardous <br />and we're afraid that somebody's going to get hurt. The building has been set <br />fire to on two different occasions and I would say it's probably 40 to SO ~Co <br />60f destroyed.. Almost the entire inside of the bu lding has been gutted by fire <br />most of the timbers have been. burned. through, again approximately 50J, the <br />building inspector stated that the ..building is, well theoretically ~~~~~}~~~ <br />be <br />~~ possible to~renova.ted~~. It .would be extremely expensive and it's my <br />recommendation that we would not attempt to rehabilitate the building. I <br />question whether or not it's quite that old.. From what I've-been told, it's not. <br />It's. somewhere more in the vacinity of 50 to 60 years old, and it, I think it <br />should be destroyed. I see no hope in renovating it. I don't know if we did <br />succeed in renovating it how significant it would be in that particular, site <br />its <br />and especially in ~}~~ condition, now it's just terrible that we have approximately <br />3 years to go before we can go in and do a,ny work on that site. We spent. almost <br />$LOOO ~bn an attempt to-break it up with 6" concrete blocks and steer reinforced <br />doors and within probably 1z months all the block was knocked out, the doors wer <br />proken down with crow bars boulders, you name it. There's literally nothing <br />left of what we did to try to secure that building. It's iaery dangerous. <br />JS Okay. If there's no further questions from-the Council, Mr. Simon is in <br />the rear of the room standing. Ken do you have any comments you'd like to make <br />with regard to the Ramsey-Gouty section or ther whole ~}~j(y~~ park? <br />KS Well T-guess just a general comment. One of the issues <br />waa whether or not the Council and the City wishes to see the park remained <br />:classified as a. regional park. more or .less. agreed upon at onetime <br />when Metro Council identified it ~,~~~,AA~~both sited together, as a regional park, <br />it's of significance aNS be'ng is~e~e~ as a regional park. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.