Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />November 10, 1986 <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />Williams believes the discussion has been informational but the <br />questions of traffic flow did not bear on whether or not Harbon <br />qualifies as a school; if it does qualify as a school, the <br />proposal would need to go to the Planning Commission. Williams <br />further stated he would have to put his faith in the City <br />Attorney's analysis and would vote to uphold the Planner's point <br />of view. <br /> <br />Gunderman again concurred with Schmidt's view that Harbon is an <br />excellent school, but would have to agree with Williams to accept <br />the City Attorney's recommendation and to uphold the Planner's <br />view. <br /> <br />Schmidt stated he generally defers to staff judgement when <br />it comes to their review of the code; however, in this proposed <br />development, staff has appealed to the council for a decision <br />and he believes Harbon is not a day care and would vote that it <br />is not a day care. <br /> <br />Benke stated, following questions and comments by the City <br />Attorney, he would agree with the Attorney that the public use <br />and all other factors that relate thereto are not present and he <br />would, therefore, also uphold staff's decision. <br /> <br />Motion by Williams, seconded by Gunderman to UPHOLD THE STAFF <br />DETERMINATION THAT THE HARBON MONTESSORI SCHOOL IS NOT A <br />PERMITTED SPECIAL USE IN THE R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, <br />DISTRICT. <br /> <br />3 Ayes - 1 Naye (Schmidt), Motion Carried <br /> <br />Benke asked Locke and Matilla to continue to work with Erks to <br />review the site by Irondale and help facilitate a development. <br /> <br />Locke had nothing to add to a staff report concerning the bid <br />award for the demolition and removal of buildings within Tax <br />Increment District No.6 and at 784 Fourth Avenue N.W. <br /> <br />Benke asked if the contract included the removal of debris from <br />the site; Locke indicated the specifications for debris removal <br />and clean-up were very extensive. <br /> <br />Motion by Schmidt, seconded by Williams, to AWARD A CONTRACT FOR <br />BUILDING REMOVAL WITHIN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT <br />DISTRICT NO. 6 AND AT 784 FOURTH AVENUE N.W. TO H & R STUMPING, <br />INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,800.00. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Page Six <br /> <br />Bid Award: Demoli- <br />tion, TIF #6 and <br />784 Fourth Ave. NW <br />Report 86-275 <br />