My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 09-04-1985
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1985
>
PRECA 09-04-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:41:39 AM
Creation date
3/30/2007 12:21:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ExTRACf Ur Mirvu~t5 <br />NEW BRIGWTON PLANNING CDMMISSION <br />REGULAR MEETIrJG <br />AUGUST 20, 1985 <br />CITY HALL EXPANSION - 5P-127 LP-l85 <br />toff stated that the proposa to expand City Wall is <br />consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, B-3 zoning re- <br />quirements and the special use standards. Staff <br />recommended that the site p]an show provisions for more <br />parking spaces. <br />Chairman Williams asked why the expanded parking was not <br />shown to the north of the existing parking lot. <br />Staff stated that soils tests for this area showed very <br />bad soils that would make parking spaces to the north <br />costly to construct and maintain. Staff had also been told <br />that the proposed future parking spaces along the east line <br />of the parking lot would interfere with the ball diamond. <br />Representative Blomquist asked how much it would cost to in- <br />stall one more row of parking to the north. <br />Bab Pierce, architect far the project, stated the future park- <br />ing spaces could be constructed if a portion of 3rd Avenue NW <br />was vacated and the ball diamond was moved further east. <br />Damon Farber, landscape architect for the project, stated it <br />would cost approximately $350 per parking space north of the <br />existing parking area. <br />Chairman Williams asked if the proposed parking . <br />of the existing lot would interfere with the playing area of <br />the existing ballfield. <br />Mr. Farver stated it would and that the ballfield is already <br />undersized. <br />Commissioner Livingston stated it would be less costly to put in <br />more parking now than to come back and rip up the curbing to put <br />in more parking later. <br />8:53 P.M.- <br />9 : 10 P. M. <br />Marje Krinke, of Krinke's Korner, asked what the required parking <br />was. <br />Staff stated that City Hall <br />fall into any of the standa <br />requirements are listed and <br />parking requirements can be <br />personal observation Brenda <br />were needed. <br />was somewhat unique because it does not <br />rd business uses where specific parking <br />that City Wall is in a B-4 zoning where <br />modified by Council approval. Based an <br />Krueger stated she felt 70 parking spaces <br />Representative B1omquist asked what the B-3 zoning required for park- <br />ing and what the possibility of the street vacation was. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.