My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 05-07-1986
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1986
>
PRECM 05-07-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:35:52 AM
Creation date
3/30/2007 3:15:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 7, 1986 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 4 <br />Van Hatten said he has lived in the area about 20 years and <br />said he uses 3rd Ave. about twice a month on the average but <br />does not recall meeting or seeing another car while on it. <br />Olson said sometimes people are more concerned with the change <br />just because it is a change rather than any logical reason. <br />Rose .asked if 3rd .Ave. remained, where would the bleachers <br />go. <br />They would have to all be on one side. <br />Johnson felt taking a poll ,would be the best way to handle this. <br />Nelson wondered how long it takes people to get out of-the parking <br />lot at St. John's <br />Van Hatten said no matter what was done there wouldn't be any <br />less accesses. <br />Seward said the park is so small - it-needs to be expanded. <br />Van Hatten was surprised that the residents were not concerned <br />about the money it would cost to upgrade .3rd Ave. if it remained <br />open. <br />Nelson thought perhaps half of the street could be taken for <br />park, ar~.d half for turn around area for St. John's parking. <br />Van Hatten said if any part of the street was taken out, it <br />would eliminate all of the street parking. <br />Johnson asked if there was a motion. <br />A resident from the audience commented that he has lived in <br />the area for 40 years and has never seen too much traffic on <br />3rd Ave. He feels in the winter it is rather hazardous because <br />at the intersection you cannot see the cross traffic coming. <br />Would not object to the closing of 3rd Ave. It would be more <br />beneficial to the park. He walks in the area about two times <br />a day. He sees alot of people walking in that area and feels <br />the walkways would be used alot. <br />Van Hatten's concern about taking a poll was how to do it <br />without alot of explanation. Would really have to be careful <br />about how you asked the question. <br />Williams stated there was a public hearing on the street re- <br />surfacing. There was some agreement to close 3rd Ave. After <br />that __a :petition against--the c,l~sing of 3r.d_AVe. came about. <br />Johnson said that if the ball diamond was expanded there would <br />be more use and more games to watch. <br />Van Hatten asked if the ball/diamond could be moved closer <br />to the street to make it bigger. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.