Laserfiche WebLink
~~ -- _1 Agenda Section: VIII -1 <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />. Report Nmnber: 9 4 -q z z <br />REQUF.S'r FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION <br />Revolt Date: 1/19/94 <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION: PARK DEVELOPMENT PLAN/INNSBRUCK 2ND AND 5TH ADDITIONS <br />DEPT. HEAD'S APPROVAL: N/A <br />MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMMENDATION: <br />~, <br />No comments to supplement this report Comments w/attach <br />EXPLANATION/SUbIlVIARY (attach supplemental sheets as necessary): <br />The City has an approximately 5 acre undeveloped pazcel of land located in the Innsbruck 2nd and 5th <br />additions. The City owned about 2.5 acres previously and the remainder of the land was acquired through <br />the City's park dedication ordinance. The configuration of the park was recommended by Harstad <br />Companies, the developer, and approved by the Park Board, Planning Commission and the City Council. <br />The configuration of the pazk with its linear nature brings many of the homes in the development into direct <br />contact with the pazk. This contact can be either a benefit or detriment depending on the perspective of <br />residents. However, each of the residents were aware of the park boundaries when they purchased their <br />properties: <br />The size, character and location of this park dictate its designation as a neighborhood park rather than a <br />community pazk like Hansen Park or asemi-natural azea such as Creekview Pazk. Neighborhood parks. in <br />New Brighton typically .range from 2.5 to 9 acres in size and contain an athletic azea, play equipment, trails, <br />a shelter. or gazebo and a hardcourt azea for basketball and/or tennis. <br />Staff has had an extensive number of contacts over the past yeaz with azea residents. In most cases, those <br />residents were concerned that development of the pazk would adversely effect the value and useability of <br />their property., The Pazk Board has had an opportunity to receive input from the Innsbruck neighborhood <br />residents, in September and October of 1993 and January, 1994 (see attached minutes). In general, residents <br />that border the park opposed development of park facilities near their property, but other residents felt very <br />strongly that there should be typical neighborhood pazk facilities and access from all sides of the park. The <br />attached plan has been approved by the Park Board and staff recommends approval. <br />Continued..... <br />Recommendation: <br />To approve the proposed plan for the pazk in the Innsbruck area incorporating the motion approved by the <br />Park Boazd at it's January 5, 1994 meeting directing staff to continue to meet with area residents on <br />construction details.. <br />~~ <br />., <br />Taurice H Anderson <br />irector of Pazks and Recreation <br /> <br />