Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />February 25, 1986 <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />In response to Schmidt's question, Winkels indicated the City <br />had increased fees three years ago and again two years ago. <br /> <br />Schmidt asked if it was possible to put information into the <br />computer for reports; Winkels stated we are trying to time the <br />review of fees into the budgeting schedule, these particular <br />fees were included in the budget last October. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Schmidt, to WAIVE THE READING <br />AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION SETTING ZONING AND PLATTING FEES AS <br />AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER VII AND VIII OF APPENDIX A, ZONING CODE AND <br />CHAPTER 26, SECTION 26-7 OF THE NEW BRIGHTON CITY CODE. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Proper asked council to review the report and to call him with <br />any questions they may have prior to the public hearings, which <br />he noted had been changed from March 11th to March 25th. Proper <br />suggested proceeding with the public hearings and then, if there <br />is a need to postpone the projects for a year because of incon- <br />sistencies with other plans, it could be postponed at that time. <br /> <br />Benke asked what the notification process would be; Proper <br />stated a letter would be mailed ten days in advance to each <br />home-owner affected, per Minnesota statutes, plus it would be <br />published in the newspaper twice. <br /> <br />Benke reviewed the project for new councilmembers, stating an <br />informational meeting was held last year with the residents. <br /> <br />Benke asked if responses to concerns brought up at the informa- <br />tional meeting would be included in the letter notifying the home <br />-owners. Proper indicated that the City always includes addi- <br />tional information beyond what is required by law; an informa- <br />tional letter summarizing the project, giving them some ideas of <br />the cost, and will include the concerns mentioned at the pre- <br />vious meeting. <br /> <br />Schmidt asked if the study had been put on the wordprocessor; <br />Proper indicated it had been. <br /> <br />Motion by Benke, seconded by Brandt, to ACCEPT THE FEASIBILITY <br />STUDY AND SET PUBLIC HEARINGS ON MARCH 25, 1986, AT THE TIMES <br />INDICATED FOR 1986 IMPROVEMENTS. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />With regard to the staff report concerning the purchase of admin- <br />istrative staff vehicles, LeFevere reviewed an updated resolution <br />which provides for council ratification of purchases. <br /> <br />Page Six <br /> <br />Feasibility Study <br />1986 Improvement <br />Projects <br />Report 86-46 <br />Resolution 86-12A <br /> <br />Administrative Staff <br />Vehicles <br />Report 86-47 <br />Resolution 86-13 <br />