Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />May 27, 1986 <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />Brandt asked if there would be common property in need of a <br />homeowners association in connection with the project; Krueger <br />stated there would be a Homeowners Association, the Covenants <br />and Declaration has been drawn up and the developer will work <br />with the homeowners on selecting their officials and all of the <br />actions taken have to be consistent with guidelines which have <br />already been drawn up. <br /> <br />Brandt asked if twelve participants would be an adequate number <br />for the amount of amenities being maintained; Krueger stated it <br />was an adequate number because there were no swimming pools or <br />tennis courts. <br /> <br />Williams asked if the developer concurs with the 25-foot set- <br />backs on the property; Jim Thyen, president of Thyen Construc- <br />tion, indicated they had no problem. <br /> <br />Schmidt recalled an area of neighborhood controvery when the <br />development was first brought to council about the recreational <br />facilities; Thyen stated the area would be commonly owned with <br />no development of amenities or uses on that area and that the <br />residents would have no opposition. <br /> <br />Schmidt asked if the single family developments had any <br />recreational facilities; Thyen indicated the Out Lot A of the <br />single family development will remain as a passive type of area <br />and will not be developed as a tennis court of swimming pool. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Brandt, to RECOMMEND APPROVAL <br />OF LP-198 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: <br /> <br />1. THAT THE PRIVATE DRIVE THROUGH THE TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT BE A <br />MINIMUM OF 22 FEET WIDE; <br />2. THAT ALL BUILDING STRUCTURES, INCLUDING DECKS, BE SET BACK <br />THE REQUIRED 25 FEET FROM THE PERIMETER OF THE PRD BOUNDA- <br />RIES; AND <br />3. CONFORMANCE WITH SITE, BUILDING, AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AS <br />APPROVED AND SIGNED AND DATED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE CITY <br />PLANNERS. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Locke reviewed staff report concerning the Community Development <br />Block Grant through Ramsey County; stated Miller & Schroeder re- <br />viewed the Tax Increment Financing aspects and found the only way <br />to make that downtown shopping center project work would be to <br />get additional funds involved and that the CDBG would be an <br />excellent way to do that. <br /> <br />(Proper arrived at 9:07 p.m.) <br /> <br />Page Ten <br /> <br />Ramsey County - CDBG <br />Report 86-125 <br />Resolution 86-52 <br />