Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />May 13, 1986 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Motion by Benke, seconded by Gunderman, to AUTHORIZE STAFF TO <br />PURSUE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FOR A DOWNTOWN <br />SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT AND PROCEED TO NEGOTIATE A DEVELOPMENT <br />AGREEMENT WITH PARKHILL. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Egan reviewed staff report concerning a resolution approving <br />guidelines for public officials involvement in financial trans- <br />actions. <br /> <br />Motion by Brandt, seconded by Williams, to WAIVE THE READING AND <br />ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS <br />INVOLVEMENT IN FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Krueger had nothing to add to the staff report concerning the <br />Planning Commission's recommendation on an ordinance amendment <br />pertaining to accessory apartments. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Benke, to NOT ADOPT AN ACCESS- <br />ORY APARTMENT ORDINANCE. <br /> <br />III 5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />In addition to the Park Board's recommendation to reappoint <br />George Carlson as the Park Board's representative to the Long <br />Lake Park Advisory Board, Benke noted that Mark Haidet, a <br />previous applicant for the Park Board, is interested in replacing <br />Larry Eickhoff as an at-large representative to the Long Lake <br />Park Advisory Board. <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Schmidt THAT THE COUNCIL <br />REAPPOINT GEORGE CARLSON AS THE PARK BOARD'S REPRESENTATIVE TO <br />THE LONG LAKE PARK ADVISORY BOARD AND APPOINT MARK HAIDET AS THE <br />AT-LARGE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE LONG LAKE PARK ADVISORY BOARD FOR <br />TWO-YEAR TERMS EACH. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Proper had no additions to the staff report concerning the Long <br />Lake Road upgrading project (Project 85-1), Phase I (north half). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Benke expressed concern with regard to the question of <br />underground utilities, stating it would appear there are about 60 <br />homes that would be impacted and would not want those people to <br />be surprised at the June 10, 1986, hearing; need to address the <br />issue of whether or not we want to proceed with the utility fee <br />as a means of paying the city's share of that cost; asked that <br />the neighbors be advised that it is an item of consideration <br />before the June 10, 1986, hearing. <br /> <br />Proper stated the information can be included with the legal <br />notice that will be sent. <br /> <br />Page Eleven <br /> <br />Public Officials <br />Involvement in <br />Financial Trans- <br />actions <br />Report 86-106 <br />Resolution 86-49 <br /> <br />Accessory Apartments <br />Ordinance Amendment <br />Report 86-107 <br /> <br />Long Park Advisory <br />Board Appointments <br /> <br />Long Lake Road <br />Upgrading Project <br />