My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-06-25
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1985
>
1985-06-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 5:17:50 AM
Creation date
8/11/2005 12:15:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Counci 1 ~1i nutes <br />June 25. 1985 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Public Hearing. continued <br /> <br />Greg Du'Monceaux, representative for the applicant, stated <br />that, because the site was so small. a mix of townhomes and <br />single family homes would not be feasible and proceeded to <br />make a presentation of 14 lots for 14 single family homes. <br />Du'Monceaux stated he is working with his engineers and our <br />staff on a drainage site problem. <br /> <br />Following a brief discussion on the timinq of the removal <br />of the existing single family home. Krueger suggested the <br />addition of Item 6 to the proDosed resolution stating "That <br />the existing family home within the site be removed within <br />120 days of the final plat approval. <br /> <br />As there was no one in the audience to address this issue, <br />Motion by Harcus, seconded by Blomquist, to CLOSE THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Motion by Blomquist, seconded by Benke. to WAIVE THE READING <br />AND ADOPT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND <br />APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT PL-142 WITH THE ADDITION OF ITEM 6 <br />READING "THAT THE EXISTING FAMILY HOME WITHIN THE SITE BE RE- <br />MOVED WITHIN 120 DAYS OF THE FINAL PLAT APPROVAL." <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes. Motion Carried <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />Bauer distributed a letter of support from the New Brighton <br />Chamber of Commerce to the councilmembers and reviewed the <br />steps that had been taken since January of 1985, <br /> <br />Harcus commented that one of the most impressive things was <br />the level of fire suppression, and believes the cost benefit <br />has improved over the last several years. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Bauer believes it best to have fire suppression systems in <br />new and existing buildings rather than spending money on new <br />trucks and building additional fire stations; and Bauer added <br />that, depending on the type of occupancy in a building, there <br />is only a three-year to ten-year payback on a system, <br /> <br />Harcus approved of the whole process and thanked Bauer for <br />taking so much time and working with the business community. <br /> <br />Benke asked if opposition to the proposed ordinance change <br />was from existing businesses or from those putting up new <br />buildings, <br /> <br />Page Five <br /> <br />Public Hearins.. <br /> <br />InnsbruCk Estates <br />Report 85-180 <br />8:04pm-8:10pm <br /> <br />Kesolution 85-61 <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Fire Suppression <br />Systems <br />Report 85-179 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.