Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Council Minutes <br />March 27, 1984 <br /> <br />Page Twelve <br /> <br />able to be made as to which would be the lowest bid for <br />the system we would like. He, too, recommended that <br />someone (in-house or consultant) look at our specifications <br />to see if they were something that could be bid upon. <br /> <br />Benke thought a workshop would be good and suggested <br />a special meeting of the Financial Policy Advisory Board <br />and, between now and then, ask staff to locate potential <br />consultants who can provide two kinds of service: <br />(1) translate staff proposal into appropriate spec form, <br />and (2) indicate to us the scope of services needed to <br />evanuate proposals received. <br /> <br />Janecek agreed that we need some form of consulting, but <br />didn't see a need for a workshop. <br /> <br />Egan indicated the purpose of a workshop would be to <br />decide policy but that, if a consultant was hired, she <br />could work with Council on the policy question without <br />a workshop. <br /> <br />Motion by Blomquist, seconded by Harcus, to DIRECT STAFF <br />TO SOLICIT A CONSULTANT AT TEN PERCENT OF THE BUDGETED <br />AMOUNT OF THE PROJECT TO ASSIST IN REVIEWING THE <br />COMPUTER SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS AND PUT THEM INTO SUITABLE <br />FORM TO OBTAIN A BID AND ALSO TO ESTIMATE WHAT IT WOULD <br />COST TO REVIEW INCOMING BIDS. <br /> <br />Benke asked that staff provide copies of the specifica- <br />tions to the Financial PolicyAdvisory Board with schedules <br />for review. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, t~otion Carried <br /> <br />Harcus asked if the fixed and variable costs had been <br />broken down in the Study. Egan replied affirmative <br />and recommended a workshop. <br /> <br />Utility Study, Receipt of <br />Report 84-73 <br /> <br />Motion by Harcus, seconded by Benke, to APPROVE A MOTION <br />TO ACCEPT THE STUDY AND SCHEDULE A WORKSHOP FOR 6:30 P.M., <br />TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 1984, TO DISCUSS THE WATER AND SEWER <br />RATE STUDY. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Anderson indicated that the Athletic Field Feasibility <br />Study would provide us with a concept plan of what can <br />be done and a cost estimate to do the work. On a <br />project of this large size, it wouldn't be feasible to <br />use in-house staff because of the complexity of it <br />(configuration of the building, fencing, and the layout <br />of theparkin9 lot) and it is further complicated as it <br />would be used for school and community. He emphasized <br />that this project probably won't be recommended unless <br />the state will help, which is one of the things he will <br />be looking at. <br /> <br />FeaSibility Study, Funds <br />for Athletic Field <br />Report 84-74 <br />